Advisory Center for Affordable Settlements & Housing

acash

Advisory Center for Affordable Settlements and Housing
ACASH

Topbar Content

Indonesia’s land reform: Implications for local livelihoods and climate change

Document DownloadDownload
Document TypeGeneral
Publish Date31/08/2018
AuthorIda Aju Pradnja Resosudarmo, et.al
Published By Forest Policy and Economics
Edited BySaba Bilquis
Uncategorized

Indonesia’s land reform: Implications for local livelihoods and climate change

One of the main components of Indonesia’s Just Economy policy is extensive and rapid land reform, which targets about 12% of the country’s land area for redistribution to farmers and communities by 2019. Much of the reform is occurring on forest land. At the same time, the country has pledged a significant reduction of its greenhouse gas emissions by 2030, two-thirds of which is to be achieved from forests. Hence agrarian reform potentially conflicts with emission reduction commitments. This research analyses how the redistribution of forests, with emphasis on the social forestry program, might affect people’s livelihoods and Indonesia’s capacity to deliver on its climate change commitments. Concerning Central Kalimantan province, we find that the land reform policy has increased the area distributed to local people through the streamlining of processes. However, ambitious targets and hurried distribution of land have posed significant challenges to processes and implementation. They result in a partial understanding of the schemes, rights, and responsibilities, inappropriate site allocation and types of forestland being distributed, and inadequate consideration for community capacity and local governance. Importantly, the resources allocated to grant these rights have not been accompanied by equal attention to foster subsequent actual land-based livelihood activities and forest protection. Hence the reform’s potential to improve local livelihoods and contribute to climate change mitigation in Central Kalimantan is unlikely to be fully realized shortly. We suggest that careful consideration be given to the processes of distribution, the type of forests being assigned, attention and support to foster implementation and monitoring and enforcement of regulations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *