The Housing Problem in The European Union and Greece: Key Dimensions and Policy Responses

Introduction

The housing problem has emerged as one of the most pressing social and political challenges in Europe, with rising prices and rents outpacing income growth amid deepening wealth inequalities. According to the September 2025 ELIAMEP policy brief by Thomas Maloutas and Dimitra Siatitsa, this crisis is not cyclical but structural rooted in construction costs, borrowing expenses, the treatment of housing as an investment asset, and the proliferation of short-term tourist rentals.
The housing problem has emerged as one of the most pressing social and political challenges in EuropeBetween 2015 and 2023, house prices across Europe increased by more than 20%, while rental prices surged by an average of 48%. Housing affordability—measured by Eurostat as the share of households spending over 40% of disposable income on housing—has become the central indicator of the crisis. In 2023, 10.6% of urban EU households exceeded this threshold. In Greece, the figure reached a staggering 31%.

Root Causes of the European Housing Problem

The document identifies three primary drivers transforming housing into an investment product, particularly in Southern Europe:
The authors argue that decades of neoliberal housing policies—privatization of public stock, reduced public funding, and financialization—have drastically limited governments' capacity to respond effectively.

The Housing Problem in Greece: From Protectionism to Free Market

Historical Context: Self-Building and Antiparochi

Greece's housing problem cannot be understood without examining its unique post-war trajectory. Unlike Western and Northern Europe, Greece never developed a welfare-state model of public social housing. Instead, access to housing was facilitated through two informal systems: self-building (state-supported acquisition of plots and materials) and antiparochi (a land-for-flats exchange system). These mechanisms produced high homeownership rates but framed housing as a private family matter rather than a social right.
Critically, the OECD data confirms that the social rental housing sector in Greece is effectively non-existent—0% compared to an OECD average of 7.8%, with the Netherlands at 34% and Austria at 23.6%.

The Current Crisis in Numbers

The Greek housing problem intensified dramatically after the sovereign debt crisis, though its consequences were not immediate. Key statistics from the document include:
The tourism boom, foreign real estate investment, and platform-based short-term rentals have further deepened the housing problem, particularly in Athens, where semi-basement apartments once functioning as de facto social housing are being converted into tourist accommodation, displacing the most vulnerable residents.

Policy Responses: EU Initiatives and National Action

EU-Level Interventions

The document highlights a significant shift: housing was historically a secondary EU competence but has now moved to the center of European policy. Key developments include:

Greece's Policy Mix: Gaps and Criticisms

The authors are sharply critical of Greece's current approach. Housing policy remains subsidy-based, fragmented, and demand-oriented. The data reveals a stark imbalance:
Tenure Category
Expenditure
Share
Owner-occupiers
€3.167 billion
83.96%
Tenants
€297 million
7.88%
Municipal social housing
€37.6 million
1.00%
Programmes such as "My Home" (subsidized loans for young buyers), "I Save Energy," and "Social Antiparochi" (a PPP mechanism on public land) dominate spending. The authors warn that Social Antiparochi, as amended in 2025, will lead to complete privatization of new housing units within a decade, as up to 70% transfers to developers and the remaining 30% can be purchased by beneficiaries.
No expenditure is directed toward creating a permanently affordable social housing stock under public control—a gap the document identifies as the most critical failure.

Strategic Recommendations

The brief calls for a dual approach combining short-term market regulation with long-term structural reform:
The authors emphasize that cash subsidies alone are neutralized by the market as increased demand, pushing prices higher. In-kind solutions—actual housing stock—are far more effective but require institutional capacity, land control, and time.

Conclusion

This ELIAMEP policy brief offers a rigorous, evidence-based examination of the housing problem as it manifests across Europe and specifically in Greece. Its value lies not only in diagnosing structural causes—financialization, tourism-driven displacement, and the absence of social housing traditions—but in mapping concrete policy pathways that combine market regulation with beyond-the-market interventions.
As the European Affordable Housing Plan takes shape and new funding instruments become available, the document serves as an essential reference for policymakers, researchers, and housing professionals seeking to reframe housing as a universal social right rather than a speculative commodity. The housing problem, as this brief makes clear, demands not incremental adjustments but a fundamental reorientation of priorities.