Perceptions on Barriers to the Use of Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction
Introduction:
Burnt clay bricks for housing construction can be readily manufactured in Ghana as all ten regions have significant clay deposits with the Ashanti region having the highest estimated deposit of 37.1 million metric tones. In recent times, burnt clay bricks have been regarded as old-fashioned and replaced by other perceived modern walling units within Kumasi, the metropolitan capital of the Ashanti Region, despite its availability, unique advantages (aesthetics, low maintenance cost, etc.), and structural and nonstructural properties.
This study involved a questionnaire survey of 85 respondents made up of architects, brick manufacturing firms, and brick house owners or occupants in the Kumasi Metropolis of Ghana and sought to examine their perceptions on barriers to the use of burnt clay bricks for housing construction. The findings revealed that the key factors inhibiting the use of burnt clay bricks for housing construction are low material demand, excessive cost implications, inappropriate use in construction, non-compatibility of burnt clay bricks with other materials, unreliable production, and transportation problems.
The findings however provide a platform for stakeholders to address the barriers to enabling the extensive use of clay bricks in housing constructions. The construction industry is very vital to socio-economic development and, in many countries, the yardstick for the measurement of national progress is hinged on the degree of contributions of the construction industry. The building materials sector is also a major contributor to the construction industry of every nation.
Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction have been used for centuries across the world thanks to their durability, aesthetic appeal, and thermal mass benefits. Despite being readily available—especially in clay-rich regions such as Ghana’s Ashanti Region—they are often overlooked in favor of “modern” alternatives. This summary examines the barriers to using Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction, based on a detailed study carried out in the Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana. The findings highlight critical economic, technical, and perceptual obstacles that limit the adoption of this otherwise advantageous material.
📍 Context & Background
Ghana, like many developing nations, faces a persistent housing shortage and relies heavily on imported cement-based blocks. Yet, Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction remain underutilized despite the presence of significant clay reserves—over 37 million metric tonnes in Ashanti alone.
These bricks offer:
-
Structural benefits including strength and thermal regulation
-
Aesthetic advantages, allowing for visually appealing finishes without additional plaster
-
Cost-efficiency, given their local production and maintenance simplicity
However, their adoption lags due to felt disadvantages across stakeholders.
🧠 Methodology
The study involved surveys with 85 participants—comprising architects, brick manufacturers, and homeowners/occupants in Kumasi. The goal was to understand perceptions and identify barriers to Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction.
Participants responded to questions relating to their experiences and opinions on:
-
Demand and usage patterns
-
Cost and production reliability
-
Compatibility with other materials
-
Quality, transportation, and design constraints
Findings were evaluated using SPSS to determine frequency and ranking.
🚧 Barriers Identified
1. Low Material Demand
Low demand for Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction emerged as a top barrier across all respondent groups. Architects, manufacturers, and occupants all cited limited market appeal as a prime factor.
This results in inconsistent orders and unstable production—further discouraging investment in brick-making facilities.
2. Excessive Cost Implications
Despite assumptions of cost savings, Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction often came out more expensive than cheaper mass-produced blocks, as perceived by architects and clients ResearchGateafricahousingnews.com.
The perceived high cost encompasses raw materials, firing energy, labor, and logistics.
3. Unavailability When Needed
Manufacturers highlighted unpredictable production schedules and seasonal reductions—especially during rainy seasons—making delivering Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction on time difficult ResearchGateafricahousingnews.com.
4. Transportation Challenges
Transportation was consistently ranked as a key barrier to Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction. Bricks are heavy and fragile; poor road conditions in Ghana exacerbate breakages and delay delivery .
5. Non-compatibility with Other Materials
Respondents raised concerns that Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction do not always integrate well with standard concrete or mechanical services—further limiting their use.
6. Inappropriate Use / Poor Workmanship
Homeowners highlighted poor workmanship—misaligned joints, uneven surfaces—as a serious barrier to adopting Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction, viewed as a sign of outdated or amateur construction.
7. Design Limitations & Psychological Biases
Limited ability to achieve creative shapes and modern forms discourages architects and clients seeking contemporary aesthetics. Some see Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction as old-fashioned or less prestigious Academiaafricahousingnews.com.
📊 Stakeholder-Specific Barriers
Architects
Top concerns: excessive cost, low demand, incompatibility, poor workmanship. They are hesitant to specify Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction when these issues risk client satisfaction.
Manufacturers
Major issues: unavailability due to seasonal disruptions, transport difficulties, cost burdens, low demand, and misuse of brick construction techniques.
Homeowners/Occupants
Their main complaints revolved around poor workmanship, insufficient demand, high cost, material incompatibility, and inconsistent availability.
🎯 Overall Findings
The consistent barriers across stakeholder groups include:
-
Low demand for Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction
-
Excessive cost implications
-
Non-compatibility with other materials
-
Unavailability / unreliable supply
-
Transportation and distribution challenges
-
Poor workmanship, limiting quality perception
These barriers, intertwined with local infrastructural and market dynamics, make Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction a less appealing option despite their theoretical advantages.
🇬🇭 Ghana-Specific Insights
-
Historically, Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction were prominent in colonial-era buildings across Kumasi and Accra.
-
Local institutions like GIHOC and missionary factories once supported production, but those facilities diminished over time.
-
Currently, less than 2% of construction uses these bricks—cement-based sandcrete blocks have become dominant.
The Building & Road Research Institute (BRRI) has noted potential economic gains—yet market uptake remains low.
🌍 Broader Context & Alternatives
Alternative materials like compressed stabilized earth blocks and fly ash bricks offer environmental benefits but face similar challenges like supply chain issues, quality control, and lack of awareness.
Studies advocate a resurgence of Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction:
-
Emphasizing thermal mass, low maintenance, and carbon footprint reduction
-
Highlighting local employment and resource efficiency.
Some comparative cost research indicates brick walling could be 18% cheaper than sandcrete blocks—challenging cost perceptions.
✅ Recommendations
The study proposes multiple strategies to overcome barriers:
-
Professional retraining
-
Upskill architects, engineers, and contractors to design and build with Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction, ensuring quality outcomes.
-
-
Subsidies for production
-
Lower costs via government incentives targeting kiln operations and raw materials.
-
-
Public education campaigns
-
Inform clients and stakeholders about the aesthetic, structural, and ecological benefits of Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction.
-
-
Standards & certification
-
Implement industry standards to ensure brick quality, compatibility, and workmanship credibility.
-
-
Infrastructure improvement
-
Upgrade rural road access to cut transport costs and reduce delays.
-
-
Policy support
-
Mandate or incentivize Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction in public housing or institutional buildings, favoring local materials over imported alternatives.
-
💡 Implications & Future Directions
-
If stakeholders overcome these barriers, Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction could become a low-carbon, cost-effective, and sustainable building material for developing countries.
-
Broader research is recommended to explore:
-
Performance of modern kiln designs
-
Market dynamics and procurement models
-
Community-built approaches and social acceptance
-
✅ Conclusion
Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction remain a powerful yet undervalued resource in Ghana and similar contexts. Despite their inherent structural, thermal, and economic benefits, entrenched barriers like cost perceptions, low market demand, poor supply consistency, and outdated design views limit their adoption. A holistic strategy involving policy support, capacity building, infrastructure upgrades, and public awareness is essential to revive these bricks as a mainstream solution in affordable and sustainable housing.
By addressing these challenges, Burnt Clay Bricks for Housing Construction can reclaim an important role in constructing resilient, culturally resonant, and environmentally responsible housing.
Also Read: Combatting the housing shortage through institutional reform: The parallel cases of Germany and Sweden