Facility Acquisition and Architectural Fabric Structure Technology

Document Download	Download
Document Type	General
Publish Date	17/06/2023
Author
Published By
Edited By

Introduction

Architectural Fabric Structures and innovative procurement strategies are at the heart of a 1988 technical report by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), which investigates cutting-edge methods to enhance cost-efficiency, reduce construction timelines, and improve the quality of military facility development. The report focuses on two key alternatives to conventional building practices: One-Step Competitive ("Turnkey") Negotiation and Architectural Fabric Structure Technology. These approaches were rigorously evaluated through six case studies to assess their effectiveness and potential as viable solutions within military construction environments.

Objectives of the Study

The primary goals of the study were to:

Assess the effectiveness of One-Step Competitive Negotiation in streamlining the facility acquisition process.
Evaluate the practicality and benefits of Architectural Fabric Structures as a construction technology.
Identify potential cost savings, time reductions, and quality improvements associated with these methods.
Provide recommendations for integrating these approaches into standard USACE practices.

One-Step Competitive ("Turnkey") Negotiation

Overview

The One-Step Competitive Negotiation, also known as the "Turnkey" approach, consolidates the design and construction phases into a single contract. This method allows for a more streamlined procurement process, potentially leading to faster project completion and cost savings.

Case Studies

Two physical fitness centers were constructed using this method:

Fort Bliss, Texas
Fort Stewart, Georgia

Findings

Time Efficiency: The Turnkey approach reduced the overall project timeline by eliminating the need for separate design and construction bidding processes.
Cost Savings: Consolidating contracts led to more competitive pricing and reduced administrative overhead.
Quality Control: Having a single entity responsible for both design and construction improved accountability and coordination.

Architectural Fabric Structures

Definition

Architectural Fabric Structures are buildings that utilize a fabric membrane stretched over a structural framework, typically made of steel or other durable materials. These structures are known for their lightweight nature, flexibility, and rapid deployment capabilities.

Advantages

Rapid Construction: Fabric structures can be erected more quickly than traditional buildings, making them ideal for urgent facility needs.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lower material and labor costs contribute to overall budget savings.
Portability: These structures can be disassembled and relocated, offering versatility for changing operational requirements.
Environmental Benefits: Fabric structures often require fewer resources to construct and can be designed for energy efficiency.

Case Studies

Four projects were analyzed to assess the application of architectural fabric structures:

Temporary Warehousing Facilities
Aircraft Hangars
Training Centers
Maintenance Shops

Findings

Performance: Fabric structures met the functional requirements for various military applications, providing adequate shelter and operational space.
Durability: With proper maintenance, these structures demonstrated resilience to environmental factors.
User Satisfaction: Personnel reported satisfaction with the functionality and comfort of the facilities.

Comparative Analysis

Aspect	Traditional Construction	Turnkey Approach	Fabric Structures
Time Efficiency	Moderate to Long	Improved	High
Cost	High	Reduced	Lowest
Flexibility	Low	Moderate	High
Portability	None	Limited	High
Environmental Impact	Higher	Moderate	Lower

Recommendations

Based on the findings, the report recommends:

Adoption of Turnkey Contracts: For projects where time and cost are critical factors, the Turnkey approach offers significant advantages.
Integration of Fabric Structures: For temporary or rapidly deployable facilities, architectural fabric structures provide a viable alternative to traditional construction.
Policy Updates: USACE should consider revising procurement and construction policies to accommodate these alternative methods.
Training and Education: Personnel should be trained in the planning, construction, and maintenance of fabric structures to ensure successful implementation.

Conclusion

The exploration of architectural fabric structures and the Turnkey acquisition method presents promising alternatives to conventional construction practices within military contexts. These approaches offer tangible benefits in terms of cost savings, time efficiency, and operational flexibility. By embracing these innovative methods, the USACE can enhance its ability to meet the evolving needs of military infrastructure development.